The huge financial volcano smoking away next to
us.
By Nick Louth
(writing for MSN May 2010)
If you are
worried about volcanoes, you should forget Iceland.
Right on
Britain’s doorstep there is a smouldering debt volcano which
threatens to tear apart the European single currency, ejecting
weaker indebted countries like Greece, perhaps Portugal and even
Spain, and turn all dreams of European integration and harmony
into ashes.
If it goes off,
Britain is bound to get caught in the blast.
The eruption
would be caused by Greece, which despite all the extra credit
and support it has recently received probably cannot pay its
debts. If you want to take cover, make a note of 2013 or 2014.
That’s when it is likely to happen. But the chances are we’ll
get some hefty rumblings much sooner.
“There is a
risk that this current crisis could cause the break-up of the
Eurozone,” said Ben May, European economist at Capital
Economics.
If the worst
happens, the euro would collapse, or revert to being a small
collection of stronger North European states. The European
economy would be paralysed. Banks right across the region, many
already on government life support, would take billions in
losses in the most indebted countries. Confidence that western
governments always pay their debts would be shattered.
Why we
should worry
Should we care? Definitely.
Europe,
remember, is Britain’s pre-eminent customer for goods and
services, taking more than 55 per cent of our exports and
supporting millions of jobs. London’s financial centre, more
than any other city, oils the industrial wheels of the
continent. UK banks have lent billions to the most indebted
countries. Whether we like it or not, we depend on Europe, and
on European trade.
Most
immediately, we’re not exactly the best creditors ourselves.
Britain owes a net £890 billion, and not just to foreigners. Our
own pension funds, investment firms and banks are stuffed with
government bonds, known here as gilts. Investors already worry
that what happens to Greece or Portugal could easily happen to
Britain.
If this
sounds apocalyptic, I make no apologies. Certainly, the €740
billion
(£625 billion) support package for the euro put
together at the start of last week by the EU and IMF ended an
immediate crisis, but made clearer the dangers of a bigger one.
Touching the
void
Like a group of
exhausted climbers ascending an ice wall, the EU this month had
to decide whether or not to cut loose its weakest member,
Greece, which was dangling over a precipice. Instead, the
stronger members, led by France and Germany pledged to pull
harder, while urging Greece, Portugal and Spain to dump as much
excess weight as possible. It isn’t hard to see that the risk is
of the whole Eurozone expedition tumbling into oblivion.
But the very
nature of the euro makes it very much harder for struggling
countries to climb out of debt and deficit problems, because
they cannot devalue their currency to create economic growth,
nor can they cut interest rates. Right from the outset, it has
been obvious that the euro’s biggest flaw is the flip side of
its greatest advantage: the fixed exchange rate and interest
rate regime among member states.
Britain’s
advantage
Contrast
Britain and Spain, both struggling with huge debts caused by the
global financial crisis, both with banking sectors obsessed by
lending on overvalued property, both with big trade and current
account deficits, but one out of the euro and one in.
Sterling has on
a trade-weighted basis fallen 25% since the start of the
financial crisis in July 2007, and exporters’ confidence is now
at a 15-year high because the goods that Britain makes and the
services it provides are now much more price competitive.
However, for Spain that route to growth is choked off. It was
the last major European economy to emerge from recession, and
still has a staggering 20% unemployment.
Why Greece
just cannot make it
Greece, with
€300 billion of debt, has worse problems than any of its
neighbours, The national debt is expected to reach 120% of GDP
this year, compared with 62% for the UK.
There’s a
simple rule of thumb which shows the power of debt once it
matches income. Lets say an economy owes a trillion on which it
pays 3% interest. If it only earns a trillion in GDP, then it
needs 3% economic growth just to service the debt. Everything
extra you earn goes on interest not repaying capital, so you’re
running just to stand still.
Coming an
Acropolis?
In fact, the
Greek economy isn’t expected to grow at all until 2013, and
then just by 1% according to the IMF. Its debt is expected to
peak at 150% of GDP in 2013 according to ratings agency Fitch,
and its average cost of existing debt is 4.5%.
Clearly Greek
debt will continue to worsen for years as it borrows to pay
interest. Though the government will undoubtedly chop back its
spending deficit from its current 13.6% of GDP, its target of
knocking 11 points off it by 2013 is “historically
unprecedented” according to Fitch. In the meantime, Greece will
still have to borrow to fund spending too.
As Thomas
Mayer, chief economist at Deutsche said last month, Greece has
entered "a death spiral of government insolvency."
Likely
scenarios
Greece is going
to be okay for a couple of years. The European support package,
of which €110 billion was in loans to avoid Greece seeking new
debt, won’t run out until 2013 or so. That’s when the problems
will really begin.
The most likely
scenario, and a most damaging one for the eurozone, is that
Greece finds it politically impossible to meet its deficit
cutting commitments and defaults on its debts. European banks
alone have €272 billion tied up in Greece, according to the Bank
of International Settlements, so the financial and political
fallout across the European economy would be enormous.
Exit sign
for the euro
It gets worse,
though. By 2013 there is a good chance that eurozone interest
rates will be edging higher to deal with the inflation that has
always been the European Central Bank’s primary concern. That
won’t be any help to Greece, which will want to boost its
economy at any cost.
Though Athens
would be reluctant to leave the Eurozone, it restores the two
key tools of economic policy – interest rates and exchange rates
– and would be domestically less painful than further squeezing
a restive population who are already furious with proposed cuts.
However, by
leaving the euro and returning to the drachma, Greece would
point the way to the exit for any other economy which in the
future doesn’t like the medicine which euro membership might
force upon it, not to mention leaving a gigantic loss for those
who had lent it money.
As German
chancellor Angela Merkel said yesterday, when introducing a ban
on trades which could be used to undermine the euro: “It is a
question of survival. The euro is in danger. If the euro fails,
then Europe fails.”
For the European
dream the stakes could hardly be higher.
.............................................................................................................................................. |